where $\E_T[\cdot] = \E[\cdot | \mathcal{G}_T]$. Indeed, from the admissible representation of $Z$ we get Jyväskylä Seminar for Young Researchers

Seminar for Young Researchers

The seminar takes place in the room MaD355 on Wednesdays at 10:15–11:15, unless otherwise stated.

Mathematicians, statisticians, students, researchers - Everyone is welcome.

In the spring we will award the best speaker with the traditional Truly Awesome Robust Honorary Award. The T.A.R.H.A. prize is awarded for the sixth time. The awarded person is chosen by a public vote.

If you are willing to give a talk or have any questions you can contact
Riku Anttila (riku.t.anttila[at]jyu.fi),
Janne Taipalus (janne.m.m.taipalus[at]jyu.fi), or
Onni Hinkkanen (onni.u.i.hinkkanen[at]jyu.fi).

Talks in Spring 2026

21.1. Jakub Takáč: Which planar sets look finite with bad eyesight?

Abstract: I will introduce an "elementary" problem concerning the simple question of which (bounded) planar sets look finite if one squints their eyes, or alternatively, simply has bad eyesight. Since all people have bad eyesight (one cannot zoom infinitely), this is a very inclusive topic. The problem gets a bit more technical once one attempts to make rigorous observations as this leads to the study of measures, curves and Lipschitz maps. I will introduce all of the necessary tools in their simplest form and answer the question from the title. I will also demo some 3Blue1Brown-style animations I have been working on.

11.2. Tuomas Niemi: TBA

Abstract: TBA

18.2. Miika Manu: TBA

Abstract: TBA

25.2. Yawen Feng: TBA

Abstract: TBA

4.3. Rene Hirvelä: Prime number theorem

Abstract: The prime number theorem is the result about asymptotic distribution of prime numbers.  It was originally stated by Legendre in 1808 and proved independently by Jacques Hadamard and Charles Jean de la Vallée Poussin in 1896 by using the Riemann zeta function. Somewhat  surprisingly this simple number theoretic result  can be proven by Fourier analysis which is has nothing to do with number theory at least in principle. This is one instance that shows how powerful tool the  Fourier analysis and can be applied to wide  variety of mathematics. I try to go through  the proof but in somewhat backwards direction since machinery gets deeper that way. In the end I will also mention the connection to the (well known) Riemann hypothesis, which gives another surprising connection between number theory and complex analysis. 

11.3. Eetu Satukangas: TBA

Abstract: TBA

18.3. Veikko Vuolasto: TBA

Abstract: TBA

25.3. Shubham Jaiswal: TBA

Abstract: TBA

15.4. TBA

Abstract: TBA

22.4. TBA

Abstract: TBA

29.4. TBA

Abstract: TBA

6.5. TBA

Abstract: TBA

13.5. TBA

Abstract: TBA

20.5. Awarding of the Truly Awesome Robust Honorary Award

Abstract: We will award the sixth edition of T.A.R.H.A. to the most popular speaker of the spring chosen by a public vote.

Previous organizers

Miro Arvila
Antti Kykkänen
Janne Nurminen
Tapio Kurkinen
Timo Schultz
Ville Kivioja

Previous T.A.R.H.A award winners

Tuomas Niemi (Spring 2025)
Veikko Vuolasto (Autumn 2024)
Damian Dabrowski (Spring 2024)
Tapio Kurkinen (Autumn 2023)
Henri Hänninen (Spring 2023)

Previous seminars

Spring 2025

Fall 2024

Spring 2024

Fall 2023

Spring 2023

Fall 2022

Spring 2020

Autumn 2019

Autumn 2018

Autumn 2017

Spring 2014