Previous Next Title Page Contents

REFERENCES

1.Aaen, I., (1992) CASE tool Bootstrapping - how little strokes fell great oaks. In: Next Generation CASE tools (eds. K. Lyytinen, V.-P. Tahvanainen), IOS Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 8-17.
2.Aaen, I., Siltanen, A., Sørensen, C., Tahvanainen, V.-P., (1992) A Tale of Two Countries - CASE Experiences and Expectations. In: The Impact of Computer-Supported Technologies on Information Systems Development, (eds. Kendall et al.) Elsevier North-Holland, pp. 61-94.
3.Aalto, J.-M., (1993) Experiencies on Applying OMT to Large Scale Systems. In: Proceedings of the seminar on Conceptual Modeling and Object-Oriented Programming, (eds. A. Lehtola, J., Jokiniemi), Finnish Artificial Intelligence Society, pp. 39-47.
4.Aalto, J.-M., Jaaksi, A., (1994) Object-Oriented Development of Interactive Systems with OMT++. Proceedings of Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems (TOOLS 14) (eds. R. Ege, M. Singh, B. Mayer), Prentice-Hall, pp. 205-218.
5.Ahituv, N., (1987) A metamodel of information flow: a tool to support information systems theory, Communications of the ACM 30(9), pp.781-791.
6.Alderson, A., (1991) Meta-CASE Technology. In: Proceedings of European Symposium on Software development environments and CASE technology (eds. A. Endres, H. Weber), Springer-Verlag, No. 509, pp. 81-91.
7.Alegic, S., (1988) Object-Oriented Database Programming. Springer-Verlag, New York.
8.Andersen Consulting, (1991) Foundation-Plan/1: Object access and design (version 1.1).
9.Argyris, C., Schön, D., (1978) Organizational Learning, A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley.
10.Armense, P., Bandinelli, S., Ghezzi, C., Morzenti, A., (1993) A survey and assessment of software process representation formalism, International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 401-426.
11.Auramäki, E., Leppänen, M., Savolainen, V., (1987) Universal framework for information activities. Data Base, Fall/Winter, pp. 11-20.
12.Avison, D., (1996) Information Systems Development: A Broader Perspective. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support (eds. S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen, R. Welke), Chapman-Hall, London, pp. 263-277.
13.Avison, D., Wood-Harper, T., (1990) Multiview - an exploration in information systems development. McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead.
14.Awad, M., Kuusela, J., Ziegler, J., (1996) Object-Oriented Technology for Real-Time Systems - A Practical Approach Using OMT and Fusion, Prentice-Hall.
15.Baskerville, R., (1996) Structural Artifacts in Method Engineering: The Security Imperative. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support (eds. S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen, R. Welke) Chapman&Hall, Great Britain, pp. 8-28.
16.Baskerville, R., Travis, J., Truex, D., (1992) Systems Without Method: The Impact of New Technologies on Information Systems Development Projects. In: The Impact of Computer Supported Technologies on Information Systems Development. (eds K. Kendall, K. Lyytinen and J. DeGross), IFIP Transactions A8, North-Holland, pp. 241-269.
17.Baskerville, R., Wood-Harper, T., (1996) A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology, July.
18.Batani, C., Lenzerini, M., Navathe, B., (1992) Conceptual database design: An entity relationship approach. Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Company, Redwood City.
19.Benjamin, R., Blunt, J., (1992) Critical IT Issues: The Next Ten Years. Sloan Management Review, Summer, pp. 7-19.
20.Bennetts, P., Wood-Harper, T., (1996) A traditional methodology: Its context and future. In: Lessons learned from the use of methodologies (Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Information System Methodologies), (eds. N. Jayaratna, B. Fitzgerald), British Computer Society, pp. 97-106.
21.Bergsten, P., Bubenko Jr, J., Dahl, R., Gustafsson, M., Johansson, (1989) L.-Å., RAMATIC - a CASE shell for implementation of specific CASE tools. TEMPORA report T6.1, SISU, Stockholm.
22.Bergstra, J., Jonkers, H., Obbink, J., (1985) A software development model for method engineering. ESPRIT´84: Status report of ongoing work (eds. J. Roukens, J. Renuart), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland.
23.Bidgood, T., Jelley, B., (1991) Modeling corporate information needs: fresh approaches to the information architecture. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1.
24.Bititci, U., Carrie, A.S., (1990) Information material flow mapping. Logistics Information Management, March, pp. 31-36.
25.Blum, B., (1994) A taxonomy of software development methods. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 37, No. 11, pp. 82-94.
26.Boehm, B.W., Papaccio, P.N., (1988) Understanding and Controlling Software Costs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 14, 10 (October), pp. 1462-1477.
27.Bommel, P. van, ter Hofstede, A. H. M., van der Weide, Th.P., (1991) Semantics and verification of object-role models, Information Systems 16(5), pp. 471-495.
28.Booch, G., (1991) Object-Oriented Desing with Applications. The Benjamin/ Cummings Publishing Company Inc., Redwood City.
29.Booch, G., (1994) Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications, Benjamin/Gummings Publishing Company Inc.
30.Booch, G., Jacobson, I., Rumbaugh, J., (1996) Unified Modeling Language (version 0.9), Rational Software Corporation.
31.Booch, G., Jacobson, I., Rumbaugh, J., (1997) Unified Modeling Language: version 1.0, Rational Software Corporation.
32.Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., (1995) Unified Method for Object-Oriented Development, Documentation Set (version 0.8), Rational Software Corporation.
33.Brinkkemper, S., (1990) Formalisation of Information Systems Modelling. Thesis Publishers.
34.Brinkkemper, S., (1996) Method engineering: Engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Information and Software Technology, 38, pp. 275-280.
35.Brinkkemper, S., de Lange, M., Looman, R., van der Steen, F.H.G.C., (1989) On the derivation of method companionship by metamodelling. In: Proceedings of CASE’89, Third International Workshop On Computer-Aided Software Engineering, London, July 17-21, 1989 (ed. J. Jenkins), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 266-286.
36.Brodie, M., (1984) On the development of data models. Perspectives from artificial intelligence, databases, and programming languages (eds. M. Brodie, J. Mylopoulos,J. Schmidth), Springer-Verlag, pp. 19-47.
37.Bronts, G., Brouwer, S., Martens, C., Proper, H., (1995) A unifying object role modelling theory, Information Systems 20(3), pp. 213-235.
38.Brooks, F., (1975) The mythical man-month: Essays on software engineering. Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
39.Bubenko jr, J., (1986) Information System Methodologies -A Research View. In: Information System Design Methodologies: Improving the Practise. Proceeding of the IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference, Noordwijkerhout, the Netherlands, 5-7 may, 1986. (eds. T.W. Olle, H.G. Sol, A.A. Verrinj-Stuart) North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 289-318.
40.Bubenko jr, J., (1988) Selecting a Strategy for Computer-Aided Software Engineering (CASE). SYSLAB-report Nr. 59, University of Stockholm, Sweden.
41.Bubenko, J., Langerfors, B., Sølvberg, A., (eds.) (1971) Computer-Aided Information Systems Analysis and Design, Studentlitteratur, Lund.
42.Bubenko, J., Wangler, B., (1992) Research directions in conceptual specification development. In: Conceptual Modeling, Databases and CASE: An Integrated view of Information System Development (eds. P. Loucopoulos, R. Zicari), John Wiley, New York.
43.Buchanan, D., Boddy, D., McCalman, J., (1988) Getting in, getting on, getting out and betting back. In: Doing Research in Organizations (ed. A. Bryman), Routledge.
44.Cameron, J., (1989) JSP&JSD: The Jackson approach to software development (2nd edition), IEEE Computer Society Press.
45.CASE Outlook (1989) Where Do Repositories Come From? CASE Outlook, 4, pp. 20-29.
46.CCTA (Central Computer and Telecommunication agency) (1995) SSADM4+: reference manual, NCC Blackwell.
47.CDIF (1997): http://www.cdif.org/
48.Charette, R.N., (1989) Software Engineering Risk Analysis and Management, Intertext Publications, McGraw-Hill Book Company.
49.Checkland, P. B., (1981) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, J. Wiley, New York.
50.Checkland, P., (1991) From framework through experience to learning: the essential nature of action research. Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions (eds. H.E. Nissen, H.K. Klein, R. Hircschheim), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, North-Holland, pp. 397-403.
51.Chen, M., (1988) The integration of organization and information system modeling: a metasystem approach to the generation of group decision support systems and computer-aided software engineering. Dissertation, University of Arizona.
52.Chen, M., Nunamaker, J.F., Weber, E.S., (1989) Computer-aided software engineering: present status and future directions. Data Base, Spring, pp. 7-13.
53.Chen, P., (1976) The entity-relationship model - toward a unify view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1, 1, pp. 9-36.
54.Chikofsky, E., (1988) Software Technology People Can Really Use. IEEE Software, March, pp. 8-10.
55.Chikofsky, E., Rubenstein, B., (1988) CASE: Reliability engineering for information systems. IEEE Software, March, pp. 11-16.
56.Ciborra, C.U., (1987) Research agenda for a transaction costs approach to information systems. In: Critical Issues in Information Systems Reseach (eds. R.J. Boland, R.A. Hirschheim), John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
57.Clemons, E., Row, M., (1991) Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structural Differences. MIS Quaterly, September, pp. 275–292.
58.Coad, P., Yourdon, E., (1991a) Object-Oriented Analysis. Yourdon Press, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
59.Coad, P., Yourdon, E., (1991b) Object-Oriented Design. Yourdon Press, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
60.Coleman, D., Arnold, P., Bodoff, S., Dollin, C., Gilchrist, H., Hayes, F., Jeremes, P., (1994) Object-Oriented Development - The Fusion Method. Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs.
61.Conway, B., Hunter, R., Light, M., (1995) The AD Management Continuum: Integrated Methods, Process and Project Management, Gartner Group, Strategic Analysis Report, R-480-127.
62.Cotterman, W., Senn, J. (eds) (1992) Challenges and strategies for research in system development, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
63.Cronholm, S., Goldkuhl, G., (1994) Meanings and motivates of method customization in CASE environments - observations and categorizations from an empirical study. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on the Next Generation of CASE Tools, (eds. B. Theodoulidis), University of Twente, pp. 67-79.
64.Curtis, B., (1992) The CASE process. Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on Impact of Computer Supported Techniques on Information Systems Development. pp. 333-343.
65.Curtis, B., Kellner, M., Over, J., (1992) Process modeling, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 75-90.
66.Curtis, B., Krasner, H., Iscoe, N., (1988) A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM, 31, 11, pp. 1268-1287.
67.Danzinger, M., Haynes, (1989) P., Managing the CASE environment, Journal of Systems Management, Vol. 40, 5, pp. 29-32.
68.Davenport, T.H., Eccles, R.G., Prusak, L., (1992) Information Politics. Sloan Management Review, Fall, pp. 53-65.
69.Davenport, T.H., Short, J.E., (1990) The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign. Sloan Management Review, Summer, pp. 11-27.
70.Davis, F., (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived easy of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quaterly, vol. 13, 3, pp. 319-339.
71.Davis, G. B., Collins, R. W., Eierman, M., Nance, W. D., (1991) Conceptual Model For Research On Knowledge Work. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455, MISRC-WP-91-10.
72.Davis, G., Olson, M., (1985) Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure and Development. McGraw-Hill, New York.
73.Davis, G.B., (1982) Strategies for information requirements determination. IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 4-30.
74.De Troyer, M., Meersman, R., Ponsaert, F., (1984) RIDL User Guide, International Centre for Information Analysis Services, Control Data Belgium, Brussels, Belgium.
75.DeMarco, T., (1979) Structured Analysis and Systems Specification. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.
76.Dur, R., (1992) Business Reengineering in Information Intensive Organizations. Dissertation, the Netherlands.
77.Earl, M., (1989) Strategies for Information Technology, Prentice-Hall.
78.Ebert, J., Süttenbach, R., (1997) An OMT Metamodel, Research report 13/97, Institut für Informatik, Universität Koblenz-Landau.
79.Ebert, J., Süttenbach, R., Uhe, I., (1996) MetaCASE in practice: A Case for KOGGE, Research report 22/96, Institut für Informatik, Universität Koblenz-Landau.
80.Elmasri, R., Weeldreyer, J., Hevner, A, (1985) The category concept: an extension to the entity-relationship model, Data and Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 1, pp. 75-116.
81.Embley, D., Kurtz, D., Woodfield, S., (1992) Object Oriented Systems Analysis, A model-driven approach, Yourdon Press, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
82.Essink, L., (1988) A conceptual framework for information systems development methodologies. In: Information Technology for Organizational Systems (eds. Bullinger et al.) Elsevier-Science Publishers B.V, pp. 354-362.
83.Eynde Van, D., Bledsoe, J., (1990) The changing practice of organization development, Leadership and organization development journal, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 25-30.
84.FIPS, (1993a) Integration definition for function modeling (IDEF0), Federal Information Processing Standards Publication, 183 (FIPS 183).
85.FIPS, (1993b) Integration definition for function modeling (IDEF1X), Federal Information Processing Standards Publication, 184 (FIPS 183).
86.Firesmith, D., Henderson-Sellers, B., Graham, I., Page-Jones, M., (1996) OPEN Modeling Language (OML) Reference Manual, OPEN Consortium.
87.Fitzgerald, B., (1995) The use of system development methods: a survey. Paper ref 9/95, University College Cork.
88.Fitzgerald, B., (1996) Formalized systems development methodologies: a critical perspective. Information systems journal, 6, pp. 3-23.
89.Fitzgerald, G., (1991) Validating new information systems techniques: a retrospective analysis. In: Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions (eds. H.-E. Nissen, H.K. Klein, R. Hirschheim), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, pp. 657-672.
90.Flood, R., (1993) Beyond TQM, Wiley, Chichester.
91.Floyd, C., (1987) Outline of the paradigm change in software engineering. Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge (eds. G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, M. King) Avebury Gower, Brookfield Vermont.
92.Flynn, D., Goleniewska, E., (1993) A survey of the use of strategic information systems planning approaches in UK organizations. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol 2, No 4, pp. 292-319.
93.Forte, G., Norman, R.J., (1992) A self-assessment by the software engineering community. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 35, No. 4 (April), pp. 28-32.
94.Fraser, M., Kumar, K., Vaishnavi, V., (1991) Informal and formal requirements specification languages; Bridging the gap. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 17, 5, pp. 454-466.
95.Friedman, A., Cornford, D., (1989) Computer Systems Development: History, Organization and Implementation. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
96.Frost, S., (1994) The Select perspective: Extending Rumbaugh’s OMT for client/server system development. Select Software Tools.
97.Galliers, R.D., (1985) In search of a paradigm for information systems research. Research methods in information systems (eds. E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald, A.T. Wood-Harper), Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland, pp. 281-297.
98.Galliers, R.D., (1992) Choosing Information Systems Research Approaches. Information Systems Research: Issues, methods and practical guidelines (ed. R. Galliers), Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 144-162.
99.Galliers, R.D., Land, F.F., (1987) Choosing Appropriate Information Systems Research Methodologies, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 30, 11, pp. 900-902.
100.Gane, C., Sarson, T., (1979) Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
101.Gigch van, J.P., (1991) System design modeling and metamodeling. Plenum Press, New York.
102.Gladden, G.R., (1982) Stop the life cycle, I want to get off. Software Engineering Notes, 7, 2, pp. 35-39.
103.Goldkuhl, G., (1989) Datasystem och verksamhetsutveckling (in Swedish). Intention.
104.Goldkuhl, G., (1990) Kontextuell verksamhetsanalys med handlingsgrafer (in Swedish), Intention AB.
105.Goldkuhl, G., (1993) Verksamhets utveckla datasystem. Intention (in Swedish), Affärslitteratur AB, Linköping.
106.Goldkuhl, G., (1992) Contextual activity modeling of information systems. In: Proceeding of the Third International Working Conference on Dynamic Modelling of Information Systems, Noordwijkerhout, June 9-10.
107.Goldkuhl, G., Cronholm, S., (1993) Customizable CASE Environments: A Framework for Design and Evaluation, In: Proceedings of COPE IT’93 / NordData.
108.Goldkuhl, G., Cronholm, S., Krysander, C., (1992) Adaptation of CASE tools to different systems development methods. In: Proceedings of 15th IRIS, (eds. G. Bjerknes, T. Bratteteig, K. Kautz), Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, pp. 142-156.
109.Grant, D., Ngwenyama, O., Klein, H., (1992) Validating ISD Methodologies Within The Organizational Context: An Action Research Case Study. Working paper series, Binghampton, State University of New York, 92-215.
110.Griethuysen, J., (1982) Concepts and terminology for the conceptual schema and the information base. Publication nr. ISO/TC97/SC5-N695.
111.Grundy, J., (1993) Multiple textual and graphical views for interactive software development environments, Dissertation, University of Auckland.
112.Grundy, J., Venable, J., (1996) Towards an integrated environment for method engineering. Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support (eds. S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen, R. Welke), Chapman-Hall, London, pp. 45-62.
113.Hackathorn, R., Karimi, J., (1988) A Framework for comparing information engineering methods. MIS Quaterly, June.
114.Hammer, M., Champy, J., (1993) Reengineering the Corporation- A manifesto for business revolution. Nicholas Brealey publishing Ltd., London.
115.Hardy, C., Edwards, H., Thompson, J., (1996) The unification of method engineering approaches. In: Lessons learned from the use of methodologies (Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Information System Methodologies), (eds. N. Jayaratna, B. Fitzgerald), British Computer Society, pp. 439-450.
116.Hardy, C., Thompson, J., Edwards, H., (1995) The use, limitations and customization of structured systems development methods in the United Kingdom. Information and Software Technology, 37 (9), pp. 467-477.
117.Harel, D., (1988) On visual formalism, Communications of the ACM, 31, 5 (May), pp. 514-530.
118.Harmsen, F., (1997) Situational Method Engineering. Dissertation, Moret Ernst & Young Management Consultants, the Netherlands.
119.Harmsen, F., Brinkkemper, S., Oei, H., (1994a) A language and tool for the engineering of situational methods for information systems development, Proceeding of the 4th International Conference Information Systems Development (ISD’94), (eds. J. Zupancic, S. Wrycza), Moderna Organizacija, pp. 206-214.
120.Harmsen, F., Brinkkemper, S., Oei, H., (1994b) Situational Method Engineering for Information System Project Approaches. In: Methods and Associated Tools for the Information Systems Life Cycle (A-55), (A. Verrijn-Stuart, T. Olle), Elsevier Science B.V., North-Holland.
121.Harmsen, F., Saeki, M., (1996) Comparison of four method engineering languages. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support (eds. S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen, R. Welke) Chapman&Hall, Great Britain, pp. 209-231.
122.Harrington, H.J., (1991) Business Process Improvement. McGraw-Hill, Inc., USA.
123.Henderson-Sellers, B., (1992) A book of object-oriented knowledge : object-oriented analysis, design and implementation : a new approach to software engineering Prentice-Hall.
124.Henderson-Sellers, B., Bulthuis, A., (1996a) COMMA: Sample metamodels. Report on Object-Oriented Analysis and Design, JOOP, Nov-Dec, pp. 44-48.
125.Henderson-Sellers, B., Bulthuis, A., (1996b) The COMMA Project: Final report. COTAR technical report 95/35, University of Techology, Sydney.
126.Henderson-Sellers, B., Edwards, J., (1994) The working object — Object-oriented software engineering: methods and management. Prentice-Hall.
127.Heym, M., (1993) Methoden-Engineering Spezification und Integration von Entwicklungsmethoden für Informationssysteme (in German), Dissertation, Hochschule St.Gallen, Switzerland.
128.Heym, M., Österle, H., (1992) A Reference Model of Information Systems Development. In: The Impact of Computer Supported Technologies in Information Systems Development (eds. K.E. Kendall, K. Lyytinen, J.I. DeGross), Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp. 215-240.
129.Heym, M., Österle, H., (1993) Computer-aided methodology engineering. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 35, 6/7 (June/July), pp. 345-354.
130.Hidding, G., Gwendolyn, J., Freund, M., Joseph, J., (1993) Modeling Large Processes with Task Packages, Workshop on Modeling in the Large, AAAI Conference, Washington, D.C.
131.Hillegersberg van, J., (1997) Metamodeling-based integration of object-oriented systems development. Dissertation, Thesis Publishers, Amsterdam.
132.Hillegersberg van, J., Kumar, K., Welke, R.J., (1998) Using metamodeling to analyze the fit of object-oriented methods to languages. Proceedings of the 31st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Volume V, (eds. R. Blanning, D. King) IEEE Computer Society, pp. 323-332.
133.Hobby, J., (1993) Spending on case will raise. Computing, September.
134.Hochstettler, W., (1986) A model for supporting multiple software engineering methods in a software environment, Dissertation, The Ohio State University.
135.Hoef van de, R., Harmsen, F., (1995) Quality requirements for situational methods. In: Proceedings of the 6th Next Generation of CASE tools (ed. G. Grosz), Jyväskylä, Finland.
136.Hofstede ter, A., (1993) Information modeling in data intesive domains. Dissertation, University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
137.Hofstede ter, A., Proper, H., Weide van der, P., (1993) Formal definition of a conceptual language for the description and manipulation of information models, Information Systems, Vol. 18, 7, pp. 489-523.
138.Hofstede ter, A., Verhoef, T., (1996) Meta-CASE: Is the game worth the candle?, Information Systems Journal, 6, pp. 41-68.
139.Hofstede, A. H. M. ter, Nieuwland, E. R., (1993) Task structure semantics through process algebra, Software Engineering Journal, (8), pp.14-20.
140.Hofstede, A. H. M. ter, van der Weide, Th. P., (1993) Expressiveness in data modeling, Data & Knowledge Engineering (10), pp. 65-100.
141.Hong, S., van den Goor, G., Brinkkemper, S., (1993) A Formal Approach to the Comparison of Object-Oriented Analysis and Design Methodologies. In: Proceedings of the 26th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science (eds. J. Nunamaker, R. Sprague), Vol. 4., IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos.
142.Hopkins, T., Horan, B., (1995) Smalltalk : an introduction to application development using VisualWorks, Prentice Hall, London.
143.Huber, G., (1991) Organizational learning: the contributing process and the literatures. Organization Science, Vol. 2, No. 1., pp. 88-115.
144.Hughes, J., Reviron, E., (1996) Selection and evaluation of information system development methodologies: The gap between the theory and practice. In: Lessons learned from the use of methodologies (Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Information System Methodologies), (eds. N. Jayaratna, B. Fitzgerald), British Computer Society, pp. 309-319.
145.Hull, R., King, R., (1987) Semantic Database Modeling Survey, Applications, and Research Issues, ACM Computing surveys 19(3), pp. 201-260.
146.Humphrey, W.S., (1988) Characterizing the Software Process: A Maturity Framework. IEEE Software, March, pp. 73-79.
147.Humphrey, W.S., (1989) Managing the software process. The SEI series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley.
148.IBM (1984) Business Systems Planning — Information Systems Planning Guide. Application Manual, IBM Corporation, July.
149.IFPUG (1994) International Function Point Users Group: Function Point Counting Practices Manua”, Release 4.0, IFPUG Standards.
150.Iivari, J., (1992) Relationships, aggregations and complex objects. In: Information Modeling and Knowledge Bases III: Foundations, Theory and Applications (eds. S. Ohsuga, H. Kangassalo, H. Jaakkola, K. Hori, N. Yonezaki), IOS Press, pp. 141-159.
151.Iivari, J., Kerola P., (1983) A sociocybernetic framework for the feature analysis of information systems development methodologies. In: Information Systems Development Methodologies: A Feature Analysis (eds. T.W. Olle. H.G. Sol, C.J. Tully), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland.
152.Iona, (1997) Orbix Programming Guide. IONA Technologies PLC.
153.Isakowitz, T., Stohr, E., Balasubramanian, P, (1995) RMM: A methodology for structured hypermedia design. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 38, 8, pp. 34-44.
154.Isazadeh, H., Lamb, D., (1997) A Comparative Review of MetaCASE Tools. In: Proceedings of the Information System Development Conference, Plenum Press.
155.ISO (1990) ISO-IEC 10027. Information technology - Information Resource Dictionary System (IRDS) - Framework, ISO/IEC International standard.
156.ISO, (1991) EXPRESS Language Reference Manual, ISO TC184/SC4/WG5, Document N14, Owner: Philip Spiby, CADDETC, 171 Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 3AR, UK.
157.Jaaksi, A., (1997) Object-oriented development of interactive systems, Dissertation, Tampere University of Technology, Publications 201, Tampere, Finland.
158.Jackson, M.A. (1976) Constructive Methods of Program Design. In: Proceedings of First Conference of the European Cooperation in Informatics, Vol. 44.
159.Jacobson, I., (1992) Object-Oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case Driven Approach. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley.
160.Jarke, M., Gallersdörfer, R., Jeusfeld, M.A., Staudt, M., Eherer, S., (1995) Concept Base: A deductive object base for meta data management. Journal for intelligent information systems, 4, 2, pp. 167-192.
161.Jarke, M., Pohl, K., Rolland, C., Schmitt, J.-R. (1994) Experience-Based Method Evaluation and Improvement: A process modeling approach, In: Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference CRIS’94, (eds. Olle, T.W., Verrijn Stuart, A.A.), North-Holland Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 1-27.
162.Jarke, M., Pohl, K., Weidenhaupt, K., Lyytinen, K., Marttiin, P., Tolvanen, J.-P., Papazoglou, M., (1998) Meta modeling: A formal basis for interoperability and adaptability. In: Information Systems Interoperability (B. Krämer, M. Papazoglou), John Wiley Research Science Press.
163.Jayaratna, N., (1994) Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies: NIMSAD, A Systemic Approach, McGraw-Hill.
164.Jeffrey, D.R., (1987) Software engineering productivity models for management information system development, In: Critical Issues in Information Systems Research (eds. R. Boland, R. Hirschheim), John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 113-134.
165.Johansson, H., McHugh, P., Pendlebury, A., Wheeler, W., (1993) Business process re-engineering: Breakpoint strategies for market dominance, John Wiley and Sons.
166.Jönsson, S., (1991) Action Research. Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions (eds. H.E. Nissen, H.K. Klein, R. Hircschheim), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, North-Holland, pp. 371-396.
167.Joosten, S., Schipper, M., (1996) Validation of the Workflow Analysis Technique “Trigger Modeling”, In: Proceedings of the 2nd Americas Conference on Information Systems, Phoenix, Arizona, pp. 626-628.
168.Jordan, E., Evans, J., (1992) The simulation of IS strategy using SIMIAN. In: Dynamic Modeling of Information Systems II (eds. H.G. Sol, R.L.Grosslin), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., The Netherlands, pp. 131-144.
169.Kaasboll, J., Smordal, O., (1996) Human work as context for development of object oriented modeling techniques. Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support (eds. S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen, R. Welke), Chapman-Hall, London, pp. 111-125.
170.Katz, R. L., (1990) Business/enterprise modeling. IBM Systems Journal, Vol 29, No. 4.
171.Kelly S., Lyytinen K., Rossi M., (1996) MetaEdit+: A Fully configurable Multi-User and Multi-Tool CASE and CAME Environment. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (eds Y. Vassiliou, J. Mylopoulos), Springer Verlag.
172.Kelly, S., (1994) A matrix editor for a metaCASE environment, Information and Software Technology, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 361-171
173.Kelly, S., (1995) What’s in a Relationship? On distinguishing property holding and object holding. In: Proceeding of the IFIP conference Information System Concepts: Towards a consodilation of views (eds. E. Falkenberg, W. Hesse, A. Olive), Chapman & Hall, pp. 144-159.
174.Kelly, S., (1997) Towards a Comprehensive MetaCASE and CAME Environment: Conceptual, Architectural, Functional and Usability Advances in MetaEdit+, (Dissertation). Jyväskylä Studies in Computer Science, Economics and Statistics, No. 41, University of Jyväskylä.
175.Kelly, S., Rossi, M., (1997) Differences in Method Engineering Performance with Graphical and Matrix Tools: A Preliminary Empirical Study. Proceedings of the second CAiSE/IFIP8.1 International Workshop on Evaluation of Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design (eds. K. Siau, Y. Wand, J. Parsons), Barcelona, Spain, University of Nebraska at Lincoln.
176.Kelly, S., Smolander, K., (1996) Evolution and Issues in MetaCASE, Information and Software Technology, 38, pp. 261-266.
177.Kelly, S., Tahvanainen, V-P., (1994) Support for Incremental Method Engineering and MetaCASE. In: Proceedings of the fifth workshop on the next generation of CASE tools, B. Theodoulidis (ed.), Memoranda Informatica 94-25, University of Twente, NL, pp. 140-148.
178.Kerner, D.V., (1979) Business Information Characterization Study. Data Base, Spring.
179.Kim, W., Bertino, E., Garza, J.F. (1989) Composite objects revisited. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (eds. J. Clifford, B. Lindsay, D. Maier), SIGMOD Record, Vol. 18, No. 2.
180.Kim, Y., March, S., (1995) Comparing data modeling formalism. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 103-115.
181.Kinnunen, K., Leppänen, M., (1994) O/A-Matrix and a Technique for Methodology Engineering, Proceeding of the 4th International Conference Information Systems Development (ISD’94) (eds J. Zupancic, S. Wrycza), Moderna Organizacija, pp. 113-126.
182.Kitchenham, B., Pickard, L., Pfleeger, S., (1995) Case studies for method and tool evaluation. IEEE Software, July, pp. 52-62
183.Klein, H., (1983) A verbal rejoinder to Colter’s paper, 4th American Conference on Information Systems, Houston.
184.Konsynski, B., (1993) Strategic Control in the Extended Enterprise. IBM Systems Journal, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 111-142.
185.Kotteman, J., Konsynski, B., (1984) Information Systems Planning and Development: Strategic Postures and Methodologies. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 45-63.
186.Krasner, G., Pope, S., (1988) A Cookbook for using the model-interface-controller user interface paradigm in Smalltalk-80. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, August/September.
187.Krogstie, J., Sølvberg, A., (1996) A classification of methodical frameworks for computerized information systems support in organizations. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support (eds. S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen, R. Welke) Chapman&Hall, Great Britain, pp. 278-295.
188.Kronlöf, K., (1993) ed, Method Integration: Concepts and Case Studies. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
189.Kumar, K., Welke, R., (1984) Implementation failure and system developer values: assumptions, truisms and empirical evidence. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), (eds. L. Maggi, J. King, K. Kraemer), pp. 1-13.
190.Kumar, K., Welke, R.J., (1992) Methodology engineering: a proposal for situation-specific methodology construction. In: Challenges and Strategies for Research in Systems Development (eds. W.W. Cotterman, J.A. Senn), John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 257-269.
191.Kurki, T., (1996) Object-TT: and object-oriented system development model of TT-Group Inc (in Finnish), Syteemityö, Helsinki, 1/96, pp. 22-24.
192.Lee, H., Billington, C., (1992) Managing Supply Chain Inventory: Pitfalls and Opportunities. Sloan Management Review, Spring, pp. 65-73.
193.Lieberherr, K. J., Ignacio, S., Cun, X., (1994) Adaptive Object-Oriented Programming using Graph-Based Customization, Communications of the ACM, May, (4), pp. 94-101.
194.Lindström, H., Raitio, P., (1992) Logistics software - a survey and an analysis framework, (in Finnish), Report J-12, Technical Reseach Centre of Finland, Helsinki.
195.Loh, M., Nelson, R., (1989) Reaping CASE Harvests. Datamation, July, 1, pp. 31-34.
196.Low, G.C. Jeffrey, D.R. (1990) Function Points in the Estimation and Evaluation of the Software Process. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. SE-16, No. 1, Jan, pp. 64-71.
197.Lundeberg, M., (1982) The ISAC approach to specification of information systems and its applications to the organization of an IFIP working conference. In: Information System Design Methodologies: A Comparative Review, (eds. T.W. Olle, H.G. Sol, A.A. Verrinj-Stuart), North Holland Publishing Company.
198.Lundeberg, M., (1992) A framework for recognizing patterns when reshaping business processes. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol 1, 3 (June).
199.Lundeberg, M., Goldkuhl, G., Nilsson, A., (1981) Information Systems Development: A Systematic Approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
200.Lyytinen, K., (1986) Information systems development as social action: framework and critical implications. Dissertation, University of Jyväskylä.
201.Lyytinen, K., (1987) A taxonomic perspective of information systems development: theoretical constructs and recommendations. In: Critical issues in information systems research, (eds. R.J.Boland, R.A.Hirschheim), John Wiley & Sons Ltd., pp. 3-41.
202.Lyytinen, K., Hirschheim, R., (1987) Information System Failures - a survey and classification of the empirical literature. Oxford Surveys in Information Technology, Oxford University Press, Vol. 4, pp. 257-309.
203.Lyytinen, K., Marttiin, P., Tolvanen, J.-P., Jarke, M., Pohl, K., Weidenhaupt, K., (1998) CASE Environment Adaptability: Bridging the Islands of Automation, Submitted.
204.Lyytinen, K., Smolander, K., and Tahvanainen, V.-P., (1989) Modelling CASE Environments in Systems Development, In: Proceedings of the first Nordic Conference on Advanced Systems, SISU, Stockholm.
205.Lyytinen, K., Tahvanainen, V.-P., Smolander, K., (1991) Computer Aided Methodology Engineering (CAME) - A Research Proposal. University of Jyväskylä, Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, Jyväskylä.
206.Macdonald, K.H., (1991) The Value Process Model. In: The Corporation of the 1990s: information technology and organizational transformation (ed. M. Scott Morton). Oxford University Press, pp. 299–309.
207.March, J. G., Simon, H.A., (1958) Organizations, Wiley, New York.
208.Martin, J., Finkelstein, C., (1981) Information Engineering, Vols 1 and 2, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
209.Marttiin, P. (1994) Towards Flexible Process Support with a CASE shell, In: Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Proceedings of the Third International Conference CAiSE’94, Utrecht, The Netherlands, June 1994, G. Wijers, S. Brinkkemper and T. Wasserman (Ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 14-27.
210.Marttiin, P., (1998) Customizable Process Modeling Support and Tools for Design Environment, (Dissertation). Jyväskylä Studies in Computer Science, Economics and Statistics, No. 43, University of Jyväskylä.
211.Marttiin, P., Harmsen, F., Rossi, M., (1996) A functional framework for evaluating method engineering environments: the case of MaestroII/Decamerone and MetaEdit+. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support (eds. S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen, R. Welke) Chapman&Hall, Great Britain, pp. 63-86.
212.Marttiin, P., Lyytinen, K., Rossi, M., Tahvanainen, V. -P., Tolvanen, J. -P., (1995) Modeling requirements for future CASE: issues and implementation considerations, Information Resources Management Journal 8(1) pp. 15-25.
213.Marttiin, P., Rossi, M., Tahvanainen, V.-P., Lyytinen, K., (1993) A comparative review of CASE shells - A preliminary framework and research outcomes. Information & Management, 25, pp. 11-31.
214.Mathiassen, L., Munk-Madsen, A., Nielsen, P., Stage, J, (1995) Object oriented Design (in Danish) Marko, Aalborg.
215.Mathiassen, L., Munk-Madsen, A., Nielsen, P., Stage, J, (1996) Method engineering: Who’s the customer. Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support (eds. S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen, R. Welke), Chapman-Hall, London, pp. 232-245.
216.Mayer, B., (1992) Eiffel: The Language. Prentice-Hall, Hemel Hempstead.
217.McClure, C., (1989) CASE is software automation. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
218.McLeod, G., (1997) Method Points: Towards a metric for method complixity. In: Proceedings of the Second CAiSE/IFIP8.1 International Workshop on Evaluation of modeling techniques in systems analysis and design (EMMSAD’97), (eds. K. Siau, Y. Wand, J. Parsons).
219.Mercurio, V., Meyers, B.F., Nisbet, A.M., Radin, G., (1990) AD/Cycle strategy and architecture, IBM Systems Journal, 29, 2, pp. 170-188.
220.Meta Systems, (1989) QuickSpec - User’s Guide (version 1.0.), Meta Systems Ltd., Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
221.MetaCase Consulting, (1994) MetaEdit 1.2 User’s Guide, Micro-Works, Jyväskylä, Finland.
222.MetaCase Consulting, (1996a) MetaEdit+ (version 2.5): User’s Guide, Micro-Works, Jyväskylä, Finland.
223.MetaCase Consulting, (1996b) MetaEdit+ Method Workbench (version 2.5): User’s Guide, Micro-Works, Jyväskylä, Finland.
224.Miner, A., Mezias, S., (1996) Ugly duckling no more: Past and futures of organizational learning research. Organization Science, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 88-98.
225.Morrow, M., (ed.) (1992) Activity-based management: New approaches to measuring performance and managing costs, Woodhead-Faulkner, New York.
226.Moynihan, E., Taylor, M., (1996) A comparative examination of historical and current business systems development. In: Lessons learned from the use of methodologies (Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Information System Methodologies), (eds. N. Jayaratna, B. Fitzgerald), British Computer Society, pp. 29-40.
227.Nandhakumar, J., Avison, D., (1996) Information systems development methodology in use: An empirical study. In: Lessons learned from the use of methodologies (Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Information System Methodologies), (eds. N. Jayaratna, B. Fitzgerald), British Computer Society, pp. 205-214.
228.Naumann, J., Davis, G., McKeen, J., (1980) Determining information requirements: A contingency method for selection of a requirements assurance strategy. The Journal of Systems and Software, 1, pp. 273-281.
229.Necco, C.R., Gordon, C.L., Tsai, N.W. (1987) Systems Analysis and Design: Current Practices, MIS Quarterly, December, pp. 461-475.
230.Neches R., Fikes, R., Finin, T., Gruber, T., Patil, R., Senator, T., Swartout, W.R., (1991) Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing. AI Magazine, Fall, pp. 36-55.
231.Nijssen, G., Halpin, T., (1989) Conceptual Schema and Relational Database Design: A Fact Oriented Approach. Prentice-Hall, Sydney.
232.Nilsson, E.G., (1989) CASE Tools and Software Factories. In: Proceedings of CASE89 The First Nordic Conference on Advanced Systems Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden, May 9-11 (eds. B. Steinholtz, A. Sølvberg, L. Bergman) SISU, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 42-60.
233.Nissen, H., Jeusfeld, M., Jarke, M., Zemanek, G., Huber, H., (1996) Managing multiple requirements perspectives with metamodels. IEEE Software, March, pp. 37-48
234.Nissen, H.E., (1996) Responsible action in the use, management and development of information systems. In: Lessons learned from the use of methodologies (Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Information System Methodologies), (eds. N. Jayaratna, B. Fitzgerald), British Computer Society, pp. 1-16.
235.Nonaka, I., (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, Vol. 5., No. 1, pp. 14-37.
236.Norman, R., Chen, M., (1992) Editor’s introduction, IEEE Software, March, pp. 13-16.
237.Nuseibah, B., Finkelstein, A., Kramer, J., (1996) Method engineering for multi-perspective software development. Information and Software Technology, 38, pp. 267-274.
238.Oakland, J., (1993) Total quality management: the route to improving performance (2nd ed.), Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford.
239.Odell, J., (1996) A primer to method engineering. Presentation at the IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support, Atlanta, August, 1996.
240.Oei, J. L. H., van Hemmen, L. J. G. T., Falkenberg, E. D., Brinkkemper, S., (1992) The Meta Model Hierarchy: A Framework for Information for Information Systems Concepts and Techniques, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen.
241.Oei, J., Falkenberg, E., (1994) Harmonisation of information systems modelling and specification techniques, In: Methods and Associated Tools for the Information Systems Life Cycle, (eds. A. A. Verrijn-Stuart and T. W. Olle) No. A-55, Elsevier Science publishers, pp. 151-168.
242.Oei, J.L.H. (1995) A meta model transformation approach towards harmonisation in information system modelling. In: Information System Concepts - Towards a consolidation of views, (eds. Falkenberg, W. Hesse and A. Olivé), Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 106-127.
243.Oinas-Kukkonen, H., (1996) Method rationale in method engineering and use. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support (eds. S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen, R. Welke) Chapman&Hall, Great Britain, pp. 87-93.
244.Olle, T.W., (1994) Expanding methodologiess to handle distributed systems. In: Proceeding of IFIP TC8 conference Business Process Re-engineering: Information Systems Opportunities and Challenges, (eds. Glasson et al), Elsevier Science B.V., North-Holland, pp. 443-457.
245.Olle, T.W., Hagelstein, J., Macdonald, I.G., Rolland, C., Sol., H.G., Van Assche, F., Verrijn-Stuart, A.A., (1991) Information Systems Methodologies - A Framework for Understanding. (2nd edition) Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, The Bath Press, Avon.
246.Olle, T.W., Sol, H.G., Bhabuta, J., (eds.) (1988) Proceeding of the IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on Computerized Assistance During the Information Systems Life Cycle, Engham, England, 19-22, September, 1988. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
247.Olle, T.W., Sol, H.G., Tully, C.J., (eds.) (1983) Proceeding of the IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on Feature Analysis of Information Systems Design Methodologies, York, United Kingdom, 5-7, July, 1983. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
248.Olle, T.W., Sol, H.G., Verrijn-Stuart, A.A., (eds.) (1982) Proceeding of the IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on Comparative Review of Information Systems Design Methodologies, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, 10-14, May, 1982. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
249.Olle, T.W., Sol, H.G., Verrijn-Stuart, A.A., (eds.) (1986) Proceeding of the IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on Comparative Review of Information Systems Design Methodologies: Improving the Practise, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, 5-7, May, 1986. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
250.OMG(1997): http://www.omg.org/
251.Österle, H., Brenner, W., Hilbers, K., (1990) The implementation of Information Systems Architectures. Information Management 2000 Research Program, University of St. Gallen, Report CCIM2000/6.
252.Oz, E., (1994) When Professional Standards are Lax: The CONFIRM Failure and its Lessons. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 37, No. 10, pp. 29-36.
253.Parkinson, J., (1996) 60 minute software - strategies for accelerating the information systems delivery process. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
254.Parsons, J., Russo, N., Tolvanen, J.-P., (1997) Trainging methodology researchers: Foundational research methods. In: Proceedings of the 5th BCS Conference on Training and Education of Methodology Practioners and Reseachers (eds. N. Jayaratna, T. Wood-Harper, B. Fitzgerald) Springer.
255.Patton, M., (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, Newbury Park, Sage, 2nd edition.
256.Pohl, K., (1996) Process-Centered Requirements Engineering, Research Studies Press, John Wiley & Sons.
257.Porter, M., (1985) Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press.
258.Punter, T., Lemmen, K., (1996) The MEMA-model: towards a new approch for Method Engineering. Information and Software Technology, 38, pp. 295-305.
259.Pyburn, P., (1983) Linking the MIS Plan with Corporate Strategy: An Exploratory Study, MIS Quaterly, June, pp. 1-14.
260.Ramackers, G., (1994) Model integration and model execution. In: Methods and associated tools for information systems life-cycle. (eds. A.A. Verrijn-Stuart, T. Olle), Elsevier-Science B.V., pp. 223-239.
261.Ramesh, B., Edwards, M., (1993) Issues in the development of requirements traceability model. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symp. Requirements Engineering, San Diago, California.
262.Rapoport, R., (1970) Three dilemmas of action research. Human relations, 23, pp. 499-513.
263.Rask, R., Laamanen, P., Lyytinen, K., (1993) Automatic Derivation and Comparison of Specification Level Software Product Metrics in a CASE environment, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 19 no. 7, pp. 661-671.
264.Rockart, J., (1979) Chief Executives Define Their Own Data Needs. Harward Business Review, Vol. 57, No. 2.
265.Rockart, J.F., Hofman, J.D., (1992) Systems Delivery: Evolving New Strategies. Sloan Management Review, summer, pp. 21-31.
266.Rolland, C., Prakash, N., (1996) A proposal for context-specific method engineering. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support (eds. S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen, R. Welke) Chapman&Hall, Great Britain, pp. 191-208.
267.Rolland, C., Souveyet, C., Moreno, M., (1995) An approach for defining ways-of-working, Information Systems, 20(4), pp.337-359.
268.Ross, T.R., Schoman, K.E., (1977) Structured Analysis for Requirements Definition. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 1.
269.Rossi, M., (1995) The MetaEdit CAME environment, In: Proceedings of the MetaCase 95, University of Sunderland press, Sunderland.
270.Rossi, M., (1998) Advanced Computer Support for Method Engineering - Implementation of CAME Environment in MetaEdit+, (Dissertation). Jyväskylä Studies in Computer Science, Economics and Statistics, No. 42, University of Jyväskylä.
271.Rossi, M., Brinkkemper, S., (1996) Complexity Metrics For Systems-Development Methods And Techniques, Information Systems, 21, 2, pp. 209-227.
272.Rossi, M., Gustafsson, M., Smolander, K., Johansson, L.-Å., Lyytinen, K., (1992) Metamodeling Editor as a Front End for CASE shell, Advanced Information Systems Engineering, (ed. P. Loucopoulos), Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Science #593, Berlin, pp. 546-567.
273.Rossi, M., Tolvanen, J-P., (1995) Using Reusable Frameworks in Development of a Method Support Envionment, In: Proceedings of The WITS 1995, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, (eds. M. Jarke, S. Ram), pp. 240-249.
274.Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., Lorensen, W., (1991) Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice-Hall.
275.Russo, N., Hightower, R., Pearson, J., (1996) The failure of methodologies to meet the needs of current development environments. In: Lessons learned from the use of methodologies (Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Information System Methodologies), (eds. N. Jayaratna, B. Fitzgerald), British Computer Society, pp. 387-394.
276.Russo, N., Klomparens, R., (1993) Formal application development methdologies in the 90’s. Working paper, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois.
277.Russo, N., Wynekoop, J., Walz, D., (1995) The use and adaptation of system development methodologies. Proceedings of International Conference of IRMA (International Resources Management Association, Atlanta, May 21-14.
278.Ryan, K., Kronlöf, K., Sheehan, A., (1996) Method integration. In: Lessons learned from the use of methodologies (Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Information System Methodologies), (eds. N. Jayaratna, B. Fitzgerald), British Computer Society, pp. 235-246.
279.Saeki, M., Wenyin, K., (1994) Specifying software specification and design methods. In: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (eds. G. Wijers, S. Brinkkemper, T. Wasserman), Springer-Verlag, pp. 353-366.
280.Sauer, C., Lau, C., (1997) Trying to adopt system development methodologies - a case-based exploration of business users’ interests. Information Systems Journal, 7, pp. 255-275.
281.Savolainen, V., (1992) A dynamic framework of reference of information systems development. Dynamic modelling of information systems II (eds. H.G. Sol, R.L. Grosslin), Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 285-307.
282.Schipper, M., Joosten, S., (1996) A validation procedure for information systems modeling techniques. In: Workshop on Evaluation of Modeling methods in Systems Analysis and Design, 8th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAISE’96).
283.Schön, D., (1983) The Reflectice Practitioner, Basic Books Inc., New York.
284.Scott Morton, M., (1985) The state of the art of research. In: The Information Systems Research Challenge (eds. F. McFarlan et al.), Boston: Harward Business School Press.
285.Seppänen, V., Kähkönen, A. -M., Oivo, M., Perunka, H., Isomursu, P., Pulli, P., (1996) Strategic Needs and Future Trends of Embedded Software. Technology Development Centre, Technology review 48/96, Sipoo, Finland.
286.Shlaer, S., Mellor, S.J., (1992) Object Lifecycles: Modeling the world in states. Prentice-Hall, Yourdon Press Computing Series.
287.Slooten van, C., Schoonhoven, B., (1994) Towards Contingent Information Systems Development Approaches: In: Proceedings of ISD´94: Methods and Tools, Theory and Practice.
288.Slooten van, K., (1995) Situated Methods for Systems Development, Dissertation, University of Twente, the Netherlands.
289.Slooten van, K., Hodes, B., (1996) Characterizing IS development projects. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support (eds. S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen, R. Welke) Chapman&Hall, Great Britain, pp. 29-44.
290.Smith, H.A., McKeen, J.D., (1993) Re-engineering the Corporation: Where Does I.S. Fit In: Proceedings of the 26 th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, (eds. J.F. Nunamaker, R.H. Sprague), Vol. 3., IEEE Computer Society Press, USA.
291.Smith, J.M., Smith, D.C.P., (1977) Database abstractions: Aggregation and generalization. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Vol. 2, No 2.
292.Smith, P., Stobart, S.C., Thompson, J.B., (1990) Potential Benefits and Problems of Customizable CASE tools. In: Fourth International Workshop on Computer-Aided Software Engineering, (eds. R.J. Norman, R. Van Ghent) IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos.
293.Smolander, K., Tahvanainen, V.-P., Lyytinen, K., Marttiin, P., (1991) MetaEdit - a flexible graphical environment for methodology modeling. In: Advanced Information Systems Engineering (eds. R. Andersen, J. Bubenko, A. Sølvberg), Berlin, Germany, Springer-Verlag, pp. 168-193.
294.Smolander, K., (1991) GOPRR - a proposal for a metamodelling method, MetaPHOR-project, internal paper.
295.Smolander, K., (1991) Metamodels in CASE Environments. Licenciate thesis, Computer Science Reports, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
296.Smolander, K., (1992) OPRR - A Model for Modeling Systems Development Methods. In: Next Generation CASE Tools (eds. K. Lyytinen, V.-P. Tahvanainen) IOS Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 224-239.
297.Smolander, K., Lyytinen, K., Tahvanainen, V-.P., (1989) Family tree of methods (in Finnish), Syti-project (internal-paper), University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
298.Smolander, K., Tahvanainen, V.-P., Lyytinen, K., (1990) How to Combine Tools and Methods in Practise - a Field Study. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Second Nordic Conference CAiSE’90, (eds. B. Steinholtz, A. Sølvberg, L. Bergman) Stockholm, Sweden, May, pp. 195-211.
299.Smyth, D., Checkland, P., (1976) Using a systems approach: the structure of root definitions. Journal of applied systems analysis, Vol 5, 1.
300.Song, X., Osterweil, L., (1992) Towards Objective and Systematic Comparisons of Software Design Methodologies, IEEE Software 18 (5), pp. 43-53.
301.Sorenson, P., Tremplay, J.-P., McAllister, A., (1988) The Metaview System for Many Specifications Environments. IEEE Software, March, pp. 30-38.
302.Spurr, K., Layzell, P., Jennison, L., Richards, N., (eds.) (1994) Software assistance for business re-engineering, John Wiley & Sons.
303.Standish Group International (1995) Chaos. http://www.standishgroup.com/ chaos.html.
304.Stegwee, R.A., Van Waes, R.M., (1993) Flexible CASE tools for Information Systems Planning. In: Computer-Aided Software Engineering - Issues and Trends for the 1990s and Beyond, (ed. T. Bergin), Idea Group Publishing, pp. 248-292.
305.Sullivan, C.H., (1985) Systems Planning in the Information Age. Sloan Business Review, Vol. 26, 2, pp. 3–11.
306.Susman, G., Evered, R., (1978) An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quaterly, 23, Dec, pp. 582-603.
307.Süttenbach, R., Ebert, J., (1997) A Booch Metamodel, Research report 5/97, Institut für Informatik, Universität Koblenz-Landau.
308.Tagg, B., (1990) Implementing tool support for box structures. IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 29, 1, pp. 79-89.
309.Taivalsaari, A., Vaaraniemi, S., (1997) TDE: Supporting geographically distributed software design with shared collaborative workspaces. Proceedings of CAiSE’97, Advanced Information Systems Engineering (eds. A. Olive, J. Pastor), Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 309-408.
310.Teichroew, D., Hershey III, E., (1977) PSL/PSA: A Computer-Aided Technique for Structured Documentation and Analysis of Information Processing Systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, January.
311.Teichroew, D., Macasovic, P., Hershey III, E., Yamato, Y., (1980) Application of the Entity-Relationship Approach to Information Processing Systems Modeling, ISDOS-project, The University of Michigan.
312.Teng, J., Kettinger, W., Guha, S., (1992) Business process redesing and information architecture: establishing the missing links. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Information Systems, (eds. J. DeGross, J. Becker, J. Elam), pp. 81-89.
313.Teorey, T., (1990) Data base modeling and design: The entity-relationship approach. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Calif., USA.
314.Tollow, D., (1996) Experiences of the pragmatic use of structured methods in public sector projects. In: Lessons learned from the use of methodologies (Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Information System Methodologies), (eds. N. Jayaratna, B. Fitzgerald), British Computer Society, pp. 177-186.
315.Tolvanen, J.-P., (1995) Incremental method development for business modeling: an action research case study. In: Proceedings of the 6th Next Generation of CASE tools (ed. G. Grosz), Jyväskylä, Finland.
316.Tolvanen, J.-P., Lyytinen, K., (1993) Flexible method adaptation in CASE - the metamodeling approach. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 5, pp. 51-77.
317.Tolvanen, J.-P., Lyytinen, K., (1994) Modeling Information Systems in Business Development: Alternative perspectives on business process re-engineering. In: Proceeding of IFIP TC8 conference Business Process Re-engineering: Information Systems Opportunities and Challenges, (eds. Glasson et al), Elsevier Science B.V., North-Holland, pp. 567-579.
318.Tolvanen, J.-P., Marttiin, P., Smolander, K., (1993) An Integrated Model for Information Systems Modeling. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, (eds. J. Nunamaker, R. Sprague), IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, pp. 470-479.
319.Tolvanen, J.-P., Rossi, M., (1996) A metamodeling approach to method comparison: A survey of a set of ISD methods, WP-34, Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, University of Jyväskylä.
320.Tolvanen, J.-P., Rossi, M., Liu, H., (1996) Method engineering: current research directions and implications for future research. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support (eds. S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen, R. Welke) Chapman&Hall, Great Britain, pp. 296-317.
321.Turner, W. S., R. P. Langerhorst, G. F. Hice, H. B. Eilers and A. A. Uijttenbroek (1988) SDM: system development methodology, North-Holland.
322.Venable, J., (1993) CoCoA: A Conceptual Data Modeling Approach for Complex Problem Domains. Dissertation, State University of New York at Binghampton, United States.
323.Vepsäläinen, A., (1988) A Relational view of Activities for Systems Analysis and Design. Decision Support Systems, 4.
324.Verheijen, G., Van Bekkum, J., (1982) NIAM: An information analysis method. In: Information Systems Design Methodologies: A Comparative Review (eds. T. Olle, H. Sol, A. Verrijn-Stuart) North-Holland Publishing Company, pp. 537-589.
325.Verhoef, T., (1993) Effective Information Modeling Support. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.
326.Verhoef, T.F., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Wijers, G.M. (1991) Structuring modeling knowledge for CASE shells. In: Proceeding of CAiSE’91 Advanced Information Systems Engineering, (eds. R. Andersen, J. Bubenko, A. Sølvberg) Berlin, Germany, Springer-Verlag, pp. 502-524.
327.Vitalari, N., Dickson, G., (1983) Problem solving for effective systems analysis: an experimental exploration. Communications of the ACM, 26, 11, pp. 948-956.
328.Vlasblom, G., Rijsenbrij, D., Glastra, M., (1995) Flexibilization of the methodology of system development, Information and Software Technology, Elsevier-Science B.V., 37, No. 11, pp. 595-607.
329.Walden, K., Nerson, J.-M., (1995) Seamless Object-Oriented Software Architecture: Analysis and Design of Reliable Systems, Prentice-Hall.
330.Wand, Y., (1996) Ontology as a foundation for meta-modeling and method engineering. Information and Software Technology, 38, pp. 281-287.
331.Wangler, B., Wohed, R., Öhlund, S.-E., (1993) Business Modelling and Rule Capture in a CASE Environment. In: Proceeding of the Fourth Workshop on The Next Generation of CASE Tools (eds. S., Brinkkemper, F. Harmsen), University of Twente, The Netherlands, pp. 189-204.
332.Ward, P., Mellor, S., (1985) Structured Analysis for Real-Time Systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
333.Wasserman, A., (1980) Software tools and the user software engineering project, Technical report#46, University of California San Francisco, Medical Information Science.
334.Wastell, D., (1996) The fetish of technique: methodology as a social defence. Information Systems Journal, 6, pp. 25-40.
335.Waters, S.J., (1974) Computer-aided methodology of computer systems design. The Computer Journal, Vol. 17, 3, pp. 211-215.
336.Weber, R., Zhang, Y., (1996) An analytical evaluation of NIAM’s grammar for conceptual schema diagrams. Information Systems Journal, 6, pp. 147-170.
337.Welke, R., Konsynski, B., (1980) An examination of the interaction between technology, methodology and information systems: A tripartite view. Proceedings of the first International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 32-48.
338.Welke, R.J., (1981) IS/DSS: DBMS support for information systems development, ISRAM WP-8105-1.0, McMaster University, Hamilton.
339.Welke, R.J., (1988) The CASE Repository: More than another database application, MetaSystems Ltd., Ann Arbor.
340.Welke, R.J., Forte, G., (1989) Meta Systems on Meta Models. CASE Outlook, 4, December, pp. 35-45.
341.Wijers, G., (1991) Modeling Support in Information Systems Development, Thesis Publishers Amsterdam.
342.Wijers, G., ter Hofstede, A., van Oosterom, N., (1992) Representation of information modeling knowledge. Next Generation of CASE tools (eds. K. Lyytinen, V.-P- Tahvanainen), IOS Press, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 167-223.
343.Wijers, G., van Dort, H., (1990) Experiences with the use of CASE tools in The Netherlands. In: Advanced Information Systems Engineering, (eds. B. Steinholtz, A. Sølvberg, L. Bergman), Springer-Verlag, Germany, pp. 5-20.
344.Wood-Harper, T., (1985) Research Methods in Information Systems: Using Action research. In: Research Methods in Information Systems (eds. E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald, A.T. Wood-Harper, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland), pp. 169-191.
345.Wood-Harper, T., Antill, L., Avison, D., (1985) Information Systems Definition: The Multi-View Approach. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
346.Wynekoop, J., Conger, S., (1991) A review of computer aided software engineering research methods. In: Information Systems Research: Contemporary approches and emergent traditions, (eds. H.-E. Nissen, H.K. Klein, R. Hirchheim), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., pp. 301-325.
347.Wynekoop, J., Russo, N., (1993) System Development Methodologies: Unanswered questions and the research-practice gap. In: Proceeding of the 14th International Conference on Informtion Systems (eds. J.J. DeGross, R.P. Bostrom, D. Robey), pp. 181-190.
348.Wynekoop, J., Russo, N., (1997) Studying system development methodologies: an examination of research methods. Information System Journal, 7, pp. 47-65.
349.Wynekoop. J., Senn, J., Conger, S., (1992) The implementation of CASE tools: an innovation diffusion approach. In: The impact of computer supported technologies on information systems development, (eds. K. Kendall, K. Lyytinen, J. DeGross), North-Holland, pp. 25-41.
350.Yin, R., (1993) Applications of case study research. Sage Publications.
351.Yourdon, E., (1986) What ever happened to structured analysis? Datamation, June, pp. 133-138.
352.Yourdon, E., (1989a) Modern Structured Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
353.Yourdon, E., (1989b) Pacific Bell, American Programmer, 2, No. 9 (September), pp. 3-6.
354.Yourdon, E., (1992) The Decline and Fall of the American Programmer, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
355.Yourdon, E., Constantine, L., (1989) Structured Design: Fundamentals of a Discipline of Computer Program and Systems Design. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

Previous Next Title Page Contents